Archive


ISS-HK calls police to remove eight homeless refugees

Jul 16th, 2013 | Advocacy | Comment

Eight homeless refugees, including two children, had an evening stand-off at the ISS-HK Mongkok branch. Rising rents are pushing refugees against the ropes and many are becoming homeless. With no savings, income or salary and inadequate support from ISS, the situation is troubling as more destitute refugees become homeless. While every homeless case is disturbing, families should not be sleeping in the streets. Ibrahim arrived from Togo in 2005 and Immigration has not started his torture case yet. Realizing the asylum process takes years, in 2009 he persuaded his wife to join him and they have had two children in Hong Kong.

For several years they lived in a rundown flat in Cheung Sha Wan, struggling monthly to raise 900$ balance between 4500$ rent and 3600$ paid by ISS. Despite pawning the wife’s wedding necklace – a gift from her mother – and borrowing from anyone who listened, overdue rent increased and an irate landlord sued at the Lands Tribunal. Ibrahim begged ISS to assist but his pleases fell on deaf ears despite the presence of his two young children. After a few months the inevitable happened: an eviction notice was issued, the police enforced the court order and the helpless family was on the street. In despair Ibrahim approached Vision First and a lawyer took the case pro-bono, though the legal process was too slow to keep the home. With no option, yesterday afternoon the family took their few belongings to ISS Mongkok office ready to camp out till a viable solution was found. At this point the tragedy became a comedy.

With a reporter from am730 (daily readership of 960,000), Vision First witnessed the spectacle that unfolded over five confrontational hours, during which the indifference of ISS case workers was apparent. This 200,000,000$ giant is a helpless child when confronted with the unexpected, like rabbits dazed by the headlights of an oncoming truck. A dozen staff tried their best to look professional, but from the other side of the security glass, appeared like stunned fish circling a fishbowl when hungry cats approach. In a time of crisis greatness shine, but clearly there was none of that nor professionalism to display in those premises. The security guards were instructed to remove us. That didn’t happen. They were then instructed to stop photo taking. No luck again. ISS made a few panicked offers to Ibrahim and the other homeless refugees. When they refused in frustration the next action was predictably pathetic.

What do agents of social control do when biscuit rations and empty promises fail? We triggered this reaction often enough at UNHCR to expect ISS to call Hong Kong’s finest. Shortly afterwards, two, four, six, eight police officers entered the office with that familiar walkie-talkie chatter. Since crimes weren’t committed, the police could only attempt their best mediation technics for such an intractable problem, appreciating refugees depended entirely on ISS service or lack thereof. Everyone clashed against ISS’ rigid intransigence. Those dazed rabbits were dancing to an uncomfortable music they were unfamiliar with. They were out of their depth. They had been abandoned by Director Miss Panares, who was reported recently been discharged from hospital with high blood pressure. Vision First wishes her a speedy recovery to deal with upcoming actions that are sure to test her lateral thinking as much as her executive decision: is it worth managing a cruel program that causes refugees more harm than good?

The naivety and confusion of ISS was apparent when they asked the police to delete our photos and remove the journalists, an action that infuriated the reporters who sternly reminded ISS of freedom of press. ISS displayed an intransigence only matched by their negligence. They refused several reasonable requests to put promises in writing and couldn’t move beyond offering guesthouses while longterm dwellings were secured. Clearly they were instructed to sign nothing that would guarantee an undertaking to do the job they are paid for. At 9pm the homeless refugees broke the stand-off for the sake of the tired kids. They weren’t surprised that ISS refused to sign any guarantee their demands would be met in the near future. Even a police officer said, “It’s very difficult to find rooms. I have tried for a month to get the right flat and prices are so high!”

Exactly the point. If ISS salaries of 15,000$ to 25,000$ make it hard for them to find decent homes, what chance  do refugees have on a 1200$ budget and 15 months jails for working illegally? Something is alarmingly wrong with ISS housing policy and the cruelty it perpetuates. Its details will be revealed next Monday in the Legislative Council. Ahead of the big day, we suggest Miss Panares take a crash course in relaxing techniques to avoid hyperventilating at the sight of a disgruntled ISS clients filling the meeting room, galleries, lobbies and waiting for her outside Legco. The storm clouds are gathering and they might just blow away a whole lot of incompetence this time. 

ISS calls police on homeless refugees

The Wall Street Journal: A look at the lives of Hong Kong’s asylum seekers

Jul 16th, 2013 | Housing, Immigration, Welfare | Comment

WSJ on Ping Che 1

The Wall Street Journal: Asylum seekers in Hong Kong face slum-like conditions

Jul 16th, 2013 | Housing, Welfare | Comment

WSJ refugee slideshow

The Wall Street Journal: Hong Kong Changing the Way It Handles Refugees

Jul 16th, 2013 | Housing, Immigration, Media, Welfare | Comment

WSJ on Ping Che 2

am730 on refugee slums in Hong Kong

Jul 10th, 2013 | Housing, Welfare | Comment

M02_20130710.indd

Ming Pao report on refugee slums

Jul 10th, 2013 | Advocacy, Housing, Media, News, Welfare | Comment

English Translation

Ming Pao report on refugee slums - 10Jul2013

Ming Pao reports on refugee slum without toilet

Jul 10th, 2013 | Advocacy, Housing, Media, News, Welfare | Comment

English Translation
Ming Pao report on slum without toilet - 10Jul2013

Legal opinion on the Ping Che slums

Jul 5th, 2013 | Advocacy | Comment

The media interest on the Ping Che slums intensifies as concerned citizens query whether International Social Services (ISS) followed guidelines and abided by the law in authorizing the disbursement of government funds for these refugee slums. South China Morning Post have also uploaded the AFP video - now available here – that has been uploaded on over 30 websites worldwide. On Wednesday Vision First director Robert Tibbo visited the Ping Che slums and his comments are reported below in view of his considerable legal expertise:

Having seen the shacks in this compound, it is clear that the conditions are unacceptable. Human beings, in particular the asylum seekers, should not be living in these conditions. I question whether any of these residential premises are permissible in this area, whether this is zoned for residential living. It is clear that the asylum seekers have no choice about the extremely unhygienic conditions in which they live, including having toilets in their kitchens.

There are structures in Ping Che that clearly appear to be unsafe and dangerous. It is hard to believe that ISS and the Social Welfare Department have previously come down here and approved these living conditions. I have serious doubts that they ever came down here to approve these appalling living conditions. I would be interested to see the land title documents for these addresses and whether building permits for these residential living units even exist. I am curious as to who did the electrical work and whether the electrical work open wiring was installed by licensed electricians. Clearly this living environment for the asylum seekers comes as a great shock as Hong Kong is one of the world’s richest cities.

The Security Bureau and ISS have taken up responsibilities for the government in distributing aid, the Social Welfare Department oversee the living conditions for asylum seekers in the Ping Che area. These organizations, in my view, stand in a position of trust towards the asylum seekers, a position that I would describe as a fiduciary position. Looking at these terrible living conditions, I have my doubts about whether the government, Social Welfare Department and ISS have carried out their fiduciary duties towards asylum seekers.

This week TVB invited ISS director Ms. Panares to Ping Che for an interview, assuming she is proud of her housing program and willing to accompany journalists on an inspection. They were mistaken. Ms. Panares declined. She insisted on an interview in the comfort of her Mongkok office and offered the baffling excuse that, “Ping Che is overexposed!” 

It is important to note that at 930am the day after TVB Pearl exposed the slums on the evening news (20 June 2013, World Refugee Day), Ms. Panares and a delegation of ISS officers pounded on that compound’s metal door unannounced. The sleeping refugees were shocked to open the door and see a dozen dignitaries had been dragged out of beds on a damage control mission.

For the first time ISS suggested refugees pair up to secure village rooms for which ISS would pay deposits and advance rent. It is also reported that ISS offered, “Whatever you need, refrigerators, stoves and gas cylinders … just make a request and we will give it to you.” The refugees were surprised by this sudden thoughtful attention after being ignored, cheated and discriminated against for years. As one witty Bangladeshi observed, “ISS treated us like VIPs … Very Inhuman Persons!”

There are reasons to doubt that humanitarianism is ISS’ core motivation at this stage. Vision First is of the opinion that ISS agreements in the slums and the landlords’ contracts and electricity demand notices, having contained incorrect information, might constitute evidence of offenses falling under the Theft Ordinance (sections 14-19).

In particular, we query whether these documents might evince:

  1. Theft by deception, with risk of prejudice to the government and tax-payers;
  2. Theft by false accounting, with information stated for false accounting purposes;
  3. Conspiracy to defraud, with parties involved in an elaborate scam for years.
Legal opinion on ISS slums

Eastweek Magazine on refugee slums

Jul 3rd, 2013 | Advocacy, Food, Housing, Immigration, Media, Personal Experiences, Refugee Community | Comment

PDF of complete article

English translation of article

Eastweek on refugee slums (first page) 3Jul2013

難民打工籌錢救病女 一日黑工換十四月監

Jun 28th, 2013 | Media | Comment

http://www.pentoy.hk/%E6%99%82%E4%BA%8B/c190/2013/06/19/7433/

今日所有報紙,只有《南華早報》報道了這件事。來自斯里蘭卡的Dilan,因為在香港尋求難民身份期間,為天生心漏的孩子籌付醫藥費,在餐廳洗碗賺$200一日,被拘捕並控逾期居留期間做黑工,被判以重刑14個月監禁。更嚴厲的是,連上訴期間保釋外出,亦於昨日被高等法院駁回。

You either rob or you find a job. He took up employment, and was arrested for it.

協助Dilan的Vision First總裁Cosmo Beatson,指目前難民每月只收到$1200租務援助,另加每日$30食物費用。他反問:「你可以用三十蚊生存到一日嗎?如果你唔夠錢用,一係去搶、一係去打工。他們選擇了去打工,為什麼咁都要被人拉?」義工Lai Win Phyu,記述陪Dilini去醫院照超聲波。同是來自斯里蘭卡,Dilan的太太Dilini已懷孕。患有糖尿病的她,一個人帶著兩歲大的女兒滯留香港。Dilini的孩子天生心漏,即心裡穿了一個洞。她們去醫院,是為了尋找證據,證明Dilini的危險情況,希望可以讓醫生在法庭的求情信中寫一段,說明她需要人照顧,求法庭不要判她的丈夫入獄,或起碼上訴期間可以保釋。沒有香港人身份,令她在香港求診極度困難,到終於有醫生好心為她寫了報告,Dilini滿懷希望來到法庭,法庭卻對內容不屑一顧,認為她只須向坊間協助難民的NGO求助,孩子無需爸爸。即使到入境處見主任,入境處的保安對著她這樣一個孕婦,亦如見乞兒見狗一樣呼喝。義工記述,曾見過法官向一個難民父親大喝:「你的妻子為何懷孕?你不應該在這裡有孩子!你們這些人,就是香港的負累。」

打一日工 14個月監禁 上訴期間不准保釋

Dilan為了籌錢給心漏的孩子,冒險打黑工洗碗。這樣一宗輕微到極的「罪行」,竟然被重判14個月監禁!而當然, Dilan這種人,多數無法保釋——保釋條件之一,是你在本地要有連繫的親人,以確保你會不會潛逃。作為難民的Dilan一家,當然無親無故,亦不會令法庭信納他可以保釋。事情多麼諷刺:把Dilan關起來是怕他潛逃,事實上他潛逃了你又會很在乎?難道政府不是希望,這些難民、申請庇護的人,走得離香港愈遠愈好?

每天$30食物費,每個月$1200租津,不准打劫,更不准打工。打劫會拉,打工也會拉,判刑分分鐘可能差不多。程序就是,無身分證所以孕婦也不可以看醫生;法律就是,無家難民唯一的收容所,便是監獄。Dilan被關之後幾晚,懷孕Dilini在家中穿了羊水,身邊無人,只有兩歲的女兒。她失去知覺了幾個鐘,又或者一晚,但無人知曉。最後她終能叫了救護車,但到達醫院時,她子宮的感染已危及嬰兒安全,醫生必須為兩條命施以緊急手術。義工Lai Win Phyu的記述中,最後並沒有說到孩子最後怎樣。法庭記者沒有問。我們也許亦不想知道。

Page 12 of 17« First...1011121314...Last »